AndyF said:Why is it that they specifically need "economic migrants" and dont need indigenous people.....?
Suppose it's so they can pay them peanuts....
Now suppose they paid proper wages...
So fruit prices went up...
But wages were higher now...
So people could pay the higher fruit prices....
Balance is thus maintained, and the economy is sustainable, without turning the country into the Mexico of Europe....
...and you havent got to house all the economic migrants, so pressure on infrastructure, schools, NHS etc is reduced....
ian.p said:yes you rais a very good point i can only claim tirdness as an excuse weve resently lost several sheep to water logging on a farm i work for but it does seem a waste to get rid of all the water usualy at this time of year we cant get enogh water.
graham said:The level of wages is part of the problem, for sure, as it is the low salaries and the shit conditions that mean that teh Eastern Europeans won't come and do that work, but don't forget that employment levels generally in the UK are high; there is insufficient indigenous seasonal labour available.
Hughie said:I get the feeling that indigenous labour isn't particularly keen to do that sort of work. This may, of course, be a gross generalisation.
Reading what?whitelackington said:Tap water starting to run out in Gloucestershire this evening
They are expecting Oxford to flood tonight, Reading tomorrow
wormster said:...they use imported labour, as the locals DON'T want to work picking tomatoes in the glass...
cap 'n chris said:wormster said:...they use imported labour, as the locals DON'T want to work picking tomatoes in the glass...
Question: if the locals were to do the work could they afford a house on the wages? Or, put another way, surely the only local people likely to do the work are those who live at home with their parents and who therefore have some kind of accommodation which allows them to take on lowly paid employment - these people, however, are risking getting caught in a financial trap since the longer they work for low pay, the less likely it is that they will succeed in establishing their own independent lives with their own property etc.; put simply, it's not so much a lack of affordable housing, as a lack of remuneration. The foreign workers are happy to live in cramped basic accommodation (i.e. caravans) while they scrimp and save a small fortune which, when they return home, becomes a larger fortune. So, far from local people not being bothered to get off their arses, they are probably keen to work (as most people are) provided the wages won't mean they are forced to live in penury.
cap 'n chris said:wormster said:...they use imported labour, as the locals DON'T want to work picking tomatoes in the glass...
Question: if the locals were to do the work could they afford a house on the wages? Or, put another way, surely the only local people likely to do the work are those who live at home with their parents and who therefore have some kind of accommodation which allows them to take on lowly paid employment - these people, however, are risking getting caught in a financial trap since the longer they work for low pay, the less likely it is that they will succeed in establishing their own independent lives with their own property etc.; put simply, it's not so much a lack of affordable housing, as a lack of remuneration. The foreign workers are happy to live in cramped basic accommodation (i.e. caravans) while they scrimp and save a small fortune which, when they return home, becomes a larger fortune. So, far from local people not being bothered to get off their arses, they are probably keen to work (as most people are) provided the wages won't mean they are forced to live in penury.
Anne said:Therefore there are not many who can or will do the low paid work - hence imported labour.
AndyF said:Anne said:Therefore there are not many who can or will do the low paid work - hence imported labour.
...but the reason it's low paid work is that there are people around willing to do it for low wages. If those people weren't around, the wages would rise for the same job. Its a supply/demand situation.
Does minimum wage not apply to fruit pickers....?
graham said:It would do if the gangmasters involved didn't consider themselves above the law. See Morecambe bay cockle pickers for a high-profile comparison.
whitelackington said:After The Black death, what Europe needed was workers, not solicitors, estate agents & accountants.
To a very much larger extent than before, ordinary workers could demand and receive much higher remunaration.
Also because 1/4 to 1/3 of the population had been wiped out,
there would have been adequate accomodation (for their time)
So to answer Anne's earlier point, yes, fewer people would be better.![]()
but it's 19th century method of working and needs to be brought into line with any other employment.