In the closing ceremony at Hidden Earth this year a number of initiatives were announced with the aim being to re-invigorate the video salon and to encourage greater participation. I have been privy to some of the discussion and it all sounds like good stuff - just what is needed. My thoughts are that a YouTube channel or similar needs to be created in order to showcase the video competition entries. This would also provide an archive of the videos entered year by year. This seems to tie in with Josh's reason for starting this thread. I also think that this has the potential to make the delegate vote more relevant. The videos are only shown once during Hidden Earth. They are shown in a lecture room and in my experience over several years the only people who attend, by and large, are the judges, the videographers and their supporters. Having an internet channel would mean that the entries could be viewed online prior to Hidden Earth by a far larger number of people which should result in a more meaningful vote.
As I was a video competition judge for Eurospeleo 2016 I'm also privy to the current judging criteria and I shared these in my lecture at Hidden Earth. As an ex-teacher I knew that in order to get the best exam results for my students they needed to be fully aware of how marks were allocated within questions. I can see no harm in sharing these criteria publicly as I understand that they will be changed for next year's competition anyway. So here they are.
Each criteria is awarded a score out of 5 by each judge. There are 5 criteria and 3 judges so the final score is a number out of a potential maximum of 75.
1. The overall impression of the visual quality of the presentation
?e.g. image composition, effective lighting, clarity of image content, originality
2. Technical filming quality?
e.g steady shots, smooth shots, exposure, focus, sound quality, innovation
3. Post-production qualities
?e.g. editing to an effective storyboard, clarity of ?message?, tight editing, originality in editing, effective use of editing/post production tools, titling, innovation
4. Aesthetic and audience retention
?e.g. audience empathy, beauty, shocking, humorous, thought-provoking, surprising, supportive sound-track/music
5. Filming objectives achieved??
as intended or perceived
I hope that this is a worthwhile contribution to this discussion, and I hope that more of the video competition entrants will be encouraged to share their videos.