There is a reason that climbers don't use an Italian hitch for belaying!
[quoute]
Yes there is, you're right there.
In rock climbing it is possible for a leader to take a Fall Factor 2 fall (when the second is on a ledge and the leader falls from above the second, past him and is stopped by the full length of the rope between the leader and second assuming no runners have yet been placed).
Stopping such a large fall may not be possible with an Italian Hitch - but the extra friction provided by a Sticht Plate (or any of the other numerous designs based on a Sticht Plate) would make it possible.
Hopefully (!) belaying a caver on a ladder would not involve falls with such great force. In this case an Italian Hitch would be entirely suitable. There's a reason why climbers with dodgy belay anchors do not use a belay plate, too, as I said before.
AndyF said:
As for there being no advantages, only disadvantages, here is the question. You lifeline someone on a 2 ladder (60 ft ) pitch. You have to get the rope back up. It's quicker, IMHO, to pull the rope up through a stitch plate than to remove the Italian hitch, then retie it, and a lot less effort than feeding it up with the hitch is situ...
It is much, MUCH quicker to leave the rope as it is, pull up the rope completely, tie another Italian Hitch, unclip the previous Italian hitch and replace it with the new one. There is no need to pull the rope through the karabiner via the Italian Hitch at all! I have never done so for a free unloaded rope unless it was 2 or 3 metres of slack.
AndyF said:
Stitch plates have proved functional over many years in arresting falls, can't see why they are not applicable to caving, other than tradition...
Why not give a sticht plate a try? It does work up as well as down, though down reaps the most advantages. You need an old afashioned one ideally with a single straight slot, and no silly spring thing.
I learned how to use a Sticht Plate when I took up rock climbing back in 1985. I replaced my Sticht Plate with a Lowe Tuber and have been using that ever since WHEN ROCK CLIMBING - for the reason already mentioned.
The main disadvantage of belay plates - and a MAJOR one as far as I can see for use underground - is that they relay
entirely on being able to pull the controlling rope past the plate so that the controlling rope is in line with the loaded rope and being pulled in the opposite direction so that the belay plate then traps the rope between itself and the krab thus introducing a lot of friction.
This means the belayer must be able to take in the rope from BEHIND the belay plate with respect to the loaded rope and therefore is best suited to an indirect belay (where the belayer is tied onto the anchors and the belay plate is attached in front of the belayer to the point where the rope is attached to the belayer's harness). Underground we tend to use direct belays (where the rope is belayed directly from the anchor and the belayer is attached seprarately to the anchor. In many cases there is not enough room to pull the controlling rope BEHIND the belay plate in order to arrest a fall.
With a Italian Hitch there is no need to pull the rope BEHIND the krab, only to grip the controlling rope more firmly. The direction is not critical so the belayer can operate the belay from either side of the krab and directly in front if needs be.
Seeing as you already have a krab attached to the anchor in order to use the belay plate, then why not simply tie an Italian Hitch and attach it directly to the krab? Why introduce an extra piece of equipment which is not really suitable (unless you prefer indirect belays when belaying cavers on ladders, assuming the stance and anchor positioning allows for this...)?