• Descent 302 is published on 15 February and it will soon be on its way to our subscribers.

    In the newsdesk, read a review of the underground events at Kendal Mountain Festival, plus tales of cannibalism and the Cavefish Asteroid.

    In regional news, we have three new connections in Ogof Agen Allwedd, a report on the iron mines of Anjou, an extension to Big Sink Cave in the Forest of Dean, a new dig in Yorkshire's Marble Steps Pot, student parties, an obituary for Tony Boycott, a tight find in the Peak District and a discovery in County Kerry with extensive formations.

    Click here for details of this edition

Photography Showcase 3 per week limit

Morning Badlad, is this the short little 'nuisance-crawl' in the exit from the Main Chamber? If so, has it somehow got clogged up with washed-in stones etc.? I don't remember it being anything like as unpleasant-looking as in your picture.
 
It's beyond the 'up and down' climb you can do if you want to stay dry - like I did. :) Then the duck is just before the Craven dig as I understand it.
 
Sell Gill 04.jpg

@Pegasus and @Badlad in Sell Gill at the weekend. Thanks for a fun trip 😀
 
I like that last image as it tells a story. Its not overcooked by some editing programme. Yes its posed but in a way that tells the story. They have had fun and are pleased with their achievment. Its a simple set up and it works. So I try not to be patronizing but as ever try to encourage folk to post similiar photos reflecting caving as fun and photography as something open to eveyone.
 
View attachment 19625
@Pegasus and @Badlad in Sell Gill at the weekend. Thanks for a fun trip

I like that last image as it tells a story. Its not overcooked by some editing programme. Yes its posed but in a way that tells the story. They have had fun and are pleased with their achievment. Its a simple set up and it works. So I try not to be patronizing but as ever try to encourage folk to post similiar photos reflecting caving as fun and photography as something open to eveyone.
I absolutely had fun, still smiling when I think back to a great weekend with Matt and Gary and Hubby. The photo isn’t lying 😁
 
The delights of the Manchester Bypass:
 

Attachments

  • MBP 2 copy.jpg
    MBP 2 copy.jpg
    213 KB · Views: 110
  • MBP 4 copy.jpg
    MBP 4 copy.jpg
    194.4 KB · Views: 114
My number three for this week. Another retrospective I did for the late Pete Rose's 70th birthday a few years ago. Trying to get " character " in a portrait image is not easy and usually has to be done very quickly before the pose sets in. Here he was bringing poles into Vurley. Whilst not known for a jolly nature Pete had many other attributes and was a good and loyal friend for 60 years. Here is Pete looking in his usual non jolly mode. We laughingly called it " The Knackered Gnome " effect. Gone but not forgotton. Yes grab those images whilst you can.

 
I am by no means an expert, but for lighting angles I learnt a lot from Chris Howes book - Cave Photography, A Practical Guide. It is based on film photography, published in 1987, but all the principles are still 100% relevant. It's just a lot easier to get good results now with remotely controlled strobes and immediate feedback with in-camera review. I bought my copy on ebay for less than £3.

I think the two things that can immediately give more depth and interest are :

- light behind the subject pointing away or at the subject, creating a silhouette (as you have done in shot 2)

- light that is off camera. when the light is on camera the shadows aren't visible in the finished photos. If you move the light off to one side or hide it somewhere off camera, then the shadow appear as diagonal lines. Your brain can decode this as depth - exactly how you view things normally. it's usual for light in a building or even the sun to be in a different spot to your eyes. (shot 3 on the left works really well without shadows because the stals are a different colour to the background. in shot 2 foreground on the ceiling they are the same colour and would really benefit from some shadows to add some black behind each one.)
 
I am by no means an expert, but for lighting angles I learnt a lot from Chris Howes book - Cave Photography, A Practical Guide. It is based on film photography, published in 1987, but all the principles are still 100% relevant. It's just a lot easier to get good results now with remotely controlled strobes and immediate feedback with in-camera review. I bought my copy on ebay for less than £3.

I think the two things that can immediately give more depth and interest are :

- light behind the subject pointing away or at the subject, creating a silhouette (as you have done in shot 2)

- light that is off camera. when the light is on camera the shadows aren't visible in the finished photos. If you move the light off to one side or hide it somewhere off camera, then the shadow appear as diagonal lines. Your brain can decode this as depth - exactly how you view things normally. it's usual for light in a building or even the sun to be in a different spot to your eyes. (shot 3 on the left works really well without shadows because the stals are a different colour to the background. in shot 2 foreground on the ceiling they are the same colour and would really benefit from some shadows to add some black behind each one.)
Thanks for the advice, I’ll have a go doing this on my next trip.
 
I think its unwise to be too critical about other folks images. I would say find your own way and dont listen too much to others. Try to see things differantly. The web is awash with formulaic images. Most that we see now are enhanced by editing or apps and AI in someway. Photos are just two things essentially. Light and composition. Get the hang of both but dont follow the crowd. I do stuff my own way. I resist the temptation to alter them too much. I use hand held torches now rather than flash. I dont use RAW and start the road to hours of tinkering at home. Always take more than one shot. If you do ten one will probably be OK. Resist the grinning back lit poses if you can. To my mind they are far too prevelant. Look for charactacter in a person. Look for the story in an image. Share your work and dont worry about what others think. Its your work done the way you want it . Essentially there is no right and wrong way. Hope to see you here again.
 
I'm going to disagree with most of what OR says there. But i will agree with:
  • Look for character in a person.
  • Look for the story in an image.
  • Hope to see you here again.
One point to add to Steve's input, be mindful of where the brightest bit of the image is. Your eye is drawn there first, so don't make it a boring bit of wall.
 
While I feel that TOR makes some valid points, I also think that if, William, you want pictures to stick on your wall or to show non-caving friends/family/colleagues what it's like underground, then character studies aren't going to cut the mustard; the chances are that non-cavers, on seeing good photos, even if they are clichéed, are more likely to say 'Wow – that's amazing'.
 
My response was quite specific and I do actually share some of TOR's opinions too. Capturing the 'fun' of caving, whilst making it 'wow' is the hardest skill of all. To be blunt, following the remote strobe formula (as expertly passed on by Chris Howes book and Mark Burkey's CNCC workshop) is a relatively quick way to get impressive looking shots that will grab the attention of cavers & non-cavers alike. It has also now become quite easy to grab the 'real caving' / characterful action shots using the like of TG cameras, go-pros and phones. Trying to get both together is where I'd like to be! One of my favorite shots I've taken was a mis-fired shot, whilst we had already taken the time to setup the lighting first. It's far better (IMHO) than the sterile one I'd initially setup to take.

IMG_6113.jpg
IMG_6135.jpg


As an example of lighting, there is a strobe over to the right of the camera, giving the shadows behind the stal curtains on the ceiling. Just 3 of us on this trip, the camera is on a mini-tripod stuck in the muck.
 
I am now bombarded by AI editing apps etc on Facebook so serves me right for looking. It does make you realise how many there are. There was an image of a mouse inside a flower on line today. Point is can you believe it ? Anyway some good measured responses to the question which shows ultimately that we all dont think the same way.
 
Back
Top