• Kendal Mountain Festival - The Risk Sessions followed by feature film 'Diving into Darkness'

    Saturday, November 23rd 7:30pm and 9pm at The Box - Kendal College.

    Climbing psychologist Dr Rebecca Williams talks with veteran cave diver Geoff Yeadon and 8,000m peak climber Tamara Lunger about their attitude to risk, their motivation and how we can learn to manage the dangers faced in adventure sport. Followed later the same evening - feature film 'Diving into Darkness' An awe-inspiring odyssey about cave diving icon Jill Heinerth and her journey of exploration, resilience and self discovery into the planet's deepest depths.

    Click here for ticket links

Simpson Chains

To chain or not to chain (that is the question)

  • In favour of chains being fitted to Simpson/Swinsto for pull through

    Votes: 98 89.9%
  • Not in favour of chains being fitted to Simpson/Swinto for pull through

    Votes: 11 10.1%

  • Total voters
    109

langcliffe

Well-known member
These photos have just appeared on my Facebook feed. A post by DMM. Pretty convincing before / after shots of the tat tidy up at the top of the Old Man of Hoy. Titanium gear for the marine environment with what appears to be a cut plate ring rather than welded. More of an extreme tat mess, but it’s had to argue against this as a sustainable solution. I think I’m pro chains now, especially if it can be made this neat. There may be practical limits on bolt spacing in limestone. (Photos by Ray Wood I think)

View attachment 20603

View attachment 20604
I'm not sure this is really relevant to the context under discussion.
 

Steve Clark

Well-known member
Thread tangent, but has it ever been a clean trad route? I’ve not climbed it, but as far as I’m aware it started life as a pegged and partial aid route (Bonnington 1966) and has been covered in made-made wooden wedges, rotten pegs, mixed-metal bolts, abandoned wires, stuck cams and yards of tat ever since.

They’ve not bolted the route, they’ve just cleaned it and added a bolted abseil station at the top. And made what looks to be a decent job of chopping and concealing the old bolts with resin & dust.
 

Ian Ball

Well-known member
That's great three bolts down to two. What is Ian Patrick proposing in terms of bolts going and bolts coming out?
 

JoshW

Well-known member
Trad is trad sports climbing is sport climbing 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
What if there was a bit of cord/sling at the top of a trad climb as an abseil point, would you consider this as criminal?

As long as the routes themselves remain unbolted, on popular routes like the one demonstrated, I don’t see how the climb becomes any different by having the bolts in place, other than being slightly more convenient to create your own anchor at the top of you choose as there’s less tat..

Major digressions from original topic though😅
 

Steve Clark

Well-known member
The logic of rock climbing trad ethics is a bit ridiculous sometimes. Take Napes Needle - one the first and most famous rock climbs in England. It’s mildly awkward to get back down from the top block. There’s a massive resistance to a bolt and there’s nothing natural to tie tat to on top of the block. There is a 10 point manual to build a convoluted trad anchor to get back down ‘clean’.


Except no one follows the last couple of points to down climb the 1st pitch. There’s a load of static rope tat at the belay and you can just ab off. It’s always there, yet no one complains about the tat.
 

IanWalker

Active member
tat tidy up at the top of the Old Man of Hoy
This thread is about a limestone pothole in the Dales, not a sandstone sea stack in Orkney. But since you choose share this as justification ...
  • You can already visit and walk away from Simpson Pot without pull-through. Its the traditional way and still a good trip.
  • You can already do a pull-through in Simpson Pot without leaving fixed gear. Most people already achieve this.
  • You can tidy up Simpson Pot by just removing the tat. We can all do this.

Titanium gear [...] a sustainable solution.
By what metric are you measuring sustainability here? Titanium ore production, metal refining and working is a high-impact operation, eg carbon footprint many multiples of even stainless steel. By comparison, re-purposing an offcut of old rope uses no energy at all, and costs nothing. Please substantiate your statement.
 

IanWalker

Active member
They’ve not bolted the route
They literally bolted it
they’ve just cleaned it and added a bolted abseil station at the top
and added multiple abseil stations, two of which, including the top one, are static rope!
And made what looks to be a decent job of chopping and concealing the old bolts with resin & dust.
alternatively, they used up even more virgin rock by drilling new holes next to the old ones, then brushed the old mess under the carpet leaving insitu metal behind.

chopping and hiding old bolts 'looks' tidy to you but creates new problems
(1) hides what a mess repeat bolting makes of the rock, leaving visitors with a false impression of bolting impact
(2) makes it more difficult to judge the soundness of the area the new bolts are in
(3) makes it more difficult to remove the remnants of the old bolts
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2xw

IanWalker

Active member
That's great three bolts down to two. What is Ian Patrick proposing in terms of bolts going and bolts coming out?
Are the old bolts even coming out? Or will they in fact be hammered over / cut off / plastered with resin?
 
Last edited:

mikem

Well-known member
That's great three bolts down to two. What is Ian Patrick proposing in terms of bolts going and bolts coming out?
From the additional agenda item document:
"Ian has advised that the optimum solution for both pitches would require the anchors to be linked with chains to a master point, and he has installed anchors in anticipation of this. The current solution has all sorts of tat in place, which the chains would replace and provide a long-term solution."
I believe the current P bolts are remaining for hard rigging.

(BTW - some trad routes have been turned into sport where they were basically unprotectable, usually with permission of first ascender)
 

mikem

Well-known member
Bike manufacturer found titanium used less carbon than their stainless steel (but presumably a frame has a significant difference in amounts used, whereas bolts will be very similar):

The carbon cost may be offset by titanium lasting longer / being less reactive:

& If we don't work with materials we won't improve the processes:

Old rope will be losing microfibres into the environment, but neither that, nor placing a modern bolt, will have as much impact as your very presence in that cave / on a climb - microfibres from clothing and damage caused by your movements / touch.
 
Last edited:

cavemanmike

Well-known member
Thin end of the wedge. 100 year’s from now everywhere will be full of titanium staple’s to make it easier 🙄🙄
 

Graigwen

Well-known member
Bike manufacturer found titanium used less carbon than their stainless steel (but presumably a frame has a significant difference in amounts used, whereas bolts will be very similar):
........

I think one of the most important points is that Reynolds came to realize that there is a problem, but not necessarily what was originally thought. Transport costs were far more important then expected. The solution is complete life cycle analysis from extraction to disposal, but that is very difficult to do - for instance Reynolds had to assume all their titanium was virgin metal as they could not establish what, if any, pathways were available for recycling titanium. Here is an extract from the report available at here

1728124481154.png
 

Graigwen

Well-known member
& If we don't work with materials we won't improve the processes:

This is not an article in a respected journal but a paid advertisement feature. It is some decades since I taught the history of failed alternatives to the Kroll process for titanium metal smelting, it always seemed that there ought to be a better method but none were economic. If the process suggested in this advertisement works, it might increase demand for British fluorspar?
.
 

Loki

Well-known member
All this talk about new bolts polluting caves.
Consider for not very long the environmental impact of the manufacture of your car, the pollution caused just driving to and from the cave, the farm waste washed through the cave, the p155 in the cave, the dire state of the very air we and all the other organisms in the cave. Is worrying about whether or not to stick chains and bolts in an already environmentally trashed cave really that important?
 

Ed

Active member
From an environmental point of view (except not caving in the first place), probale best bolting and installing in situ permanent ladders made out of recycled metal.

Get rid of all that use of oil to make ropes and the resultant spread of microplastics. SRT isn't that environmentally friendly when you look at it.

New bolts and chains that get rid of tat are a massive improvement.

As for climbing - plenty of trad venues have abseil / belay bolts for decades .. and alot were pegged on first ascents (Peg crack, Cow and Calf). Even Yorkshire gritstone. Harrisons Rocks is now use of belay bolts only and it's owned by BMC (now top rope only to protect t the rock).
 
Top