• Win a Rab Nexus Pull-On with the 1st of the Inglesport Fabulous 5 competitions!

    Caption competition, closes Friday 25th April

    Click here to enter

A Fish in Swinsto

Ian P

Administrator
Staff member
On a trip through Swinsto today, I was “shocked” to see a fish swimming towards me on the “long crawl”. It was located about 30m in from the bottom of the first pitch.
It was in a shallow section of streamway with no pools.
The fish was about 100mm (4inch) and swam straight between my legs. I have named him “Bob”.
IMG_4041.jpeg
IMG_4040.jpeg
 
How the hell did it get there?!?

It surely can't have come from downstream, but I can't see how it could have got in from upstream either!

A PhD in that for someone?
 
Maybe a batch of fish eggs were washed in from upstream, and the first to hatch cannibalised the rest?
 
Perhaps it's obvious to those that know, but how would fish eggs end up all the way up there to wash in?
Is there a swimable route up the hill from anywhere? All the underground rivers have significant pitches and I'm not aware of a surface stream...
 
Has been suggested that fish eggs get stuck to waterbirds and transported upstream that way (the same could apply to cavers' clothing, as it already appears to be cave adapted, although often there will be too long between trips for eggs to survive)
 
For the best answer to this conundrum, consult the writings of Graham Proudlove. (His 50 Short Passages book gives valuable detail on this in a very readable way.)

Trout are not uncommon in upland Dales caves (they're sometimes reported in Long Churn and the Penyghent canal for example). They're not spotted as often as they might be, because the water is usually very peat stained but at the moment the water in Dales cave streamways is pretty clear, so the fish are more noticeable.

Well done for getting a picture or two.

They're not cave "adapted" in the evolutionary sense; when trout enter caves they gradually lose pigment so they look very pale. But if they're brought out to daylight they recover their pigment again. They're also not blind, as is often thought. I don't think we have any true cave fishes in the UK.

If Graham spots this topic he can give a far better explanation than I can (and may correct some of the above).
 
Eels can travel overground to get around obstacles in the river, so underground no problem either!
 
They're not cave "adapted" in the evolutionary sense; when trout enter caves they gradually lose pigment so they look very pale. But if they're brought out to daylight they recover their pigment again.
That makes sense. As a child fishing for gobies in the rock pools of N Devon, I was fascinated by the way the changed colour when I put them into my red or yellow bucket, from dark coloured in the rock pool to pale sand colour once in the bucket.
 
That makes sense. As a child fishing for gobies in the rock pools of N Devon, I was fascinated by the way the changed colour when I put them into my red or yellow bucket, from dark coloured in the rock pool to pale sand colour once in the bucket.

Here's one I photographed a long way into Malham Cove Rising a while back. Definitely paler than when in a surface stream

Malham_bullhead(1).jpg
 
Some fish can change the extent of different pigments in their skin to help blend in with the background
 
I was going to post a comment that if you tried it you'd flounder, then I felt guilty (for starting the silliness) and I'd be continuing to derail an interesting topic complete with pictures of cave fish! So in a rare event of me not actually being daft 😉, I thought best leave it to more serious comments
 
Back
Top