DYO

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tony_B

Member
I'm grateful to Scrappycaver for the diligence of his record-keeping, which has allowed him to share with us the letter he received from the showcave management on the subject of the Nant y Gwared dig. In the interests of open and honest disclosure, perhaps he would care to share with the forum the full extent of his communications with Dan-yr-Ogof Caves on the subject of that dig? There were, as I recall, a number of emails and text messages exchanged and these would fully inform the discussion on here.

Also useful would be for him to share with us the emails he sent to DYO Caves and to other members of the [then] DYO CAC, the tone and nature of which went some way towards the eventual suspension of his DYO Warden Permit by the showcave management. Open and honest disclosure can only be a good thing in controversial debates like this, no? 
 

Bratchley

New member
Tony_B said:
Scrappycaver said:
Tony...we're you not digging for another entrance in the dry valley,? This would have taken you a few hundred meters beyond the far north choke and not the missing miles that you desired?
If your shaft had succeeded you would have left a route directly back to dyo and some of its best formations in the uk such as The Mostest.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yes, we did have a dig in the dry valley. The site in question is, as you very well know, close to the sink at Waun Fignen Felen, and therefore quite a long way from the Far North. Still a lot of cave to be found there. The essential difference is that we kept DYO caves fully informed of what we were doing and of our intentions should the dig ever 'go'. Your approach was somewhat different - perhaps you would care to enlighten us?

Tony, out of interest and for the sake of transparency, what were your intentions should your dig ever 'go' into the back of DYO?

Judging by the outcome of the dig mentioned in the Darkness Below article, I'm assuming you'd have needed to blast it shut otherwise DYO's insurance would've made them gate the showcave.

Also, it would be interesting to know who it was that brought the dig to the attention of NRW after permission had been given by the landowner and Ashford? If digging and caving had previously enjoyed their blissful ignorance, perhaps this wasn't necessarily the right way to go about it.
 

Tony_B

Member
Bratchley said:
Tony_B said:
Scrappycaver said:
Tony...we're you not digging for another entrance in the dry valley,? This would have taken you a few hundred meters beyond the far north choke and not the missing miles that you desired?
If your shaft had succeeded you would have left a route directly back to dyo and some of its best formations in the uk such as The Mostest.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yes, we did have a dig in the dry valley. The site in question is, as you very well know, close to the sink at Waun Fignen Felen, and therefore quite a long way from the Far North. Still a lot of cave to be found there. The essential difference is that we kept DYO caves fully informed of what we were doing and of our intentions should the dig ever 'go'. Your approach was somewhat different - perhaps you would care to enlighten us?

Tony, out of interest and for the sake of transparency, what were your intentions should your dig ever 'go' into the back of DYO?

Judging by the outcome of the dig mentioned in the Darkness Below article, I'm assuming you'd have needed to blast it shut otherwise DYO's insurance would've made them gate the showcave.

The dig went to 40m deep and with some interesting passage but sadly - and frustratingly - petered out. It never found any proper horizontal passage and to be perfectly honest the idea that it would end up anywhere near the known extent of DYO never even occurred to any of us. It's a long way from the known cave and even if it had 'gone' big-time it would have ended up on the other side of the Far North Choke. Have you ever been to the Far North? Go and have a look and your question is answered. Ever since the choke was first found in 1968 cavers have been trying to find a way through it. That's fifty years. 
 

Tony_B

Member
Bratchley said:
Also, it would be interesting to know who it was that brought the dig to the attention of NRW after permission had been given by the landowner and Ashford? If digging and caving had previously enjoyed their blissful ignorance, perhaps this wasn't necessarily the right way to go about it.

I'm not going to go into this on a public forum. Those involved, on both sides, know the exact sequence of events and the reasons why. I have requested open and honest disclosure of the communications (see earlier post) that went on and if these are published all would be transparent.   
 

PeteHall

Moderator
Tony_B said:
Bratchley said:
Tony, out of interest and for the sake of transparency, what were your intentions should your dig ever 'go' into the back of DYO?
The dig went to 40m deep and...

You appear to have side-stepped the question Tony.

Given the nature of the current discussion, understanding your by-the-book approach, agreed with all parties, could really help with a way forward.

I am also still unsure how another entrance beyond a sump is any different to the resurgence entrance, from an insurance perspective. Both provide ungated access to cave divers, however it would be a lot easier to gate a new dig than the resurgence. I am totally bemused by this.  :confused:
 

Rhys

Moderator
I'd just like to suggest that expecting logical, sensible and consistent advice about caves from an insurance company might be expecting a bit too much!
 

Tony_B

Member
PeteHall said:
You appear to have side-stepped the question Tony.

Given the nature of the current discussion, understanding your by-the-book approach, agreed with all parties, could really help with a way forward.

I am also still unsure how another entrance beyond a sump is any different to the resurgence entrance, from an insurance perspective. Both provide ungated access to cave divers, however it would be a lot easier to gate a new dig than the resurgence. I am totally bemused by this.  :confused:

I've not side-stepped the question. I've been digging on that mountain for thirty years and the intention has always been to find the miles of cave between the sinks and the known cave. A through-trip is an issue that only arises if and when you get anywhere near the known cave. Nothing that I or anyone else have found has 'gone' more than a couple of hundred metres in total, so a few dozen metres at best actually towards DYO.

As I have made clear, the dig at Nant y Gwared was started as, and declared to be, a means of providing an aggrieved caver with his own access to the cave.

As I have also made clear, it makes no difference to the insurance issue whether a potential second entrance is beyond a sump or wherever; if it is opened, insurance cover will be withdrawn until the grille at the end of showcave is locked.   
 

Tony_B

Member
2xw said:
Finest and best preserved in Europe is a bit of a stretch given the place is full of fibreglass models and drilled holes for Christmas lights, but I guess you're obliged to say that...!

You clearly have never been beyond the showcave. 
 

Scrappycaver

New member
Tony_B said:
Bratchley said:
Tony_B said:
Scrappycaver said:
Tony...we're you not digging for another entrance in the dry valley,? This would have taken you a few hundred meters beyond the far north choke and not the missing miles that you desired?
If your shaft had succeeded you would have left a route directly back to dyo and some of its best formations in the uk such as The Mostest.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yes, we did have a dig in the dry valley. The site in question is, as you very well know, close to the sink at Waun Fignen Felen, and therefore quite a long way from the Far North. Still a lot of cave to be found there. The essential difference is that we kept DYO caves fully informed of what we were doing and of our intentions should the dig ever 'go'. Your approach was somewhat different - perhaps you would care to enlighten us?

Tony, out of interest and for the sake of transparency, what were your intentions should your dig ever 'go' into the back of DYO?

Judging by the outcome of the dig mentioned in the Darkness Below article, I'm assuming you'd have needed to blast it shut otherwise DYO's insurance would've made them gate the showcave.

The dig went to 40m deep and with some interesting passage but sadly - and frustratingly - petered out. It never found any proper horizontal passage and to be perfectly honest the idea that it would end up anywhere near the known extent of DYO never even occurred to any of us. It's a long way from the known cave and even if it had 'gone' big-time it would have ended up on the other side of the Far North Choke. Have you ever been to the Far North? Go and have a look and your question is answered. Ever since the choke was first found in 1968 cavers have been trying to find a way through it. That's fifty years.
Sorry for the late reply, I've been out caving and night time seems the best for me under these circumstances! I have only glanced through your chert reply and Josh and Martin have added all the valid points.
To say you didn't know your 40mt shaft would come out between the choke and a main sink....REALLY LOL.
In 50years the choke has barely been touched. Perhaps with my 5year ban ending I can apply for my permit and ask permission  to the panel to dig the choke !
I'm not a yes man nor do I bend down to pick up the soap for anyone so no longer being on an advisory panel dictated by one wasn't for me.
Merry Christmas

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

 

alastairgott

Well-known member
I'm perverse, so I'd say ensure the cavers get that grill locked now, then change the name of the wardens to "Keyholders".

But I've already expressed that opinion, so I'll quietly slink off...
 

Bratchley

New member
Tony_B said:
Bratchley said:
Tony_B said:
Scrappycaver said:
Tony...we're you not digging for another entrance in the dry valley,? This would have taken you a few hundred meters beyond the far north choke and not the missing miles that you desired?
If your shaft had succeeded you would have left a route directly back to dyo and some of its best formations in the uk such as The Mostest.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Yes, we did have a dig in the dry valley. The site in question is, as you very well know, close to the sink at Waun Fignen Felen, and therefore quite a long way from the Far North. Still a lot of cave to be found there. The essential difference is that we kept DYO caves fully informed of what we were doing and of our intentions should the dig ever 'go'. Your approach was somewhat different - perhaps you would care to enlighten us?

Tony, out of interest and for the sake of transparency, what were your intentions should your dig ever 'go' into the back of DYO?

Judging by the outcome of the dig mentioned in the Darkness Below article, I'm assuming you'd have needed to blast it shut otherwise DYO's insurance would've made them gate the showcave.

The dig went to 40m deep and with some interesting passage but sadly - and frustratingly - petered out. It never found any proper horizontal passage and to be perfectly honest the idea that it would end up anywhere near the known extent of DYO never even occurred to any of us. It's a long way from the known cave and even if it had 'gone' big-time it would have ended up on the other side of the Far North Choke. Have you ever been to the Far North? Go and have a look and your question is answered. Ever since the choke was first found in 1968 cavers have been trying to find a way through it. That's fifty years.

I've certainly been to the choke many times, bigger chokes have been passed, especially when both ends can be reached. That's not relevant to my point anyway.

The point I was trying to make was, had your dig gone big time and you'd have been fortunate enough to have broken into the showcave through some magical aven and bypassing the choke, do you think that we would be in the same position as now? Where your dig becomes the only entrance and all recreational access through DYO main entrance stops...

Would that be OK? How would you have dealt with that?

Regardless of the outcome, the difference on the face of things is little. Neither dig had NRW permission, just your one wasnt the one that got close enough to the main cave. No matter the intentions, both technically *could* have and I'm sure neither of you would have stopped short of the main cave had you reached it.
 

Tony_B

Member
Bratchley said:
The point I was trying to make was, had your dig gone big time and you'd have been fortunate enough to have broken into the showcave through some magical aven and bypassing the choke, do you think that we would be in the same position as now? Where your dig becomes the only entrance and all recreational access through DYO main entrance stops...

Would that be OK? How would you have dealt with that?

Regardless of the outcome, the difference on the face of things is little. Neither dig had NRW permission, just your one wasnt the one that got close enough to the main cave. No matter the intentions, both technically *could* have and I'm sure neither of you would have stopped short of the main cave had you reached it.

In short, the answer is that at the time we were digging in the dry valley there were none of the tensions that currently exist. The situation now is very different to how it was then.
 

Tony_B

Member
Martin Laverty said:
In S Wales we now have four of these groups, none of which now report on their meetings, and few of which reveal the identity of any of their members. The PDCMG used to be quite democratic (albeit jerrymandered) but has ceased to publish details of its meetings or show any interest in maintaining its website; the MLCMAC has a more attractive website, but says virtually nothing about  its composition or meetings - we just get to see who the secretary is because it is part of his website [http://mlcmac.org]; the OFDCMG [http://ofdcmc.org.uk/] has an attractive website, but only names its secretary; while the DYOCAP has an excellent website [http://www.dyo.org.uk], but reveals the identities of none of its officials, nor of when the meeting which started this thread took place.

I suppose we must trust that these shady operations really do aim to help all cavers get into dark places rather than just keep them in the dark about what is really behind all this. But S Wales does seem to be like a black hole into which caving news disappears with only faint echos of any activity emerging.

I didn't get the chance yesterday to respond to Martin's point, and as a long-term member of the DYO CAC (now CAP) I will attempt to answer the questions raised by his post.

First, a history lesson: for many years access beyond the showcave in DYO was managed by SWCC. The club ran a leader system under which caving clubs were allowed a number of guest leaders, who could apply for this status once they were able to demonstrate knowledge of the cave. This was seen as being somewhat inequitable, and an attempt to change the rules was rather badly handled. The showcave management took back control and created the DYO Cave Advisory Committee (CAC). It was formed of (mostly local) cavers and representatives from the showcave, the BBNPA and the CCW, the precursor to today's NRW. Elsie Little was the Secretary of this and wardens will recall applying to her for permits. The position of Chairman was always held by a caver, the cavers on the committee were elected at wardens' meetings, and while this was ostensibly democratic the meetings consisted of a very small pool from which to elect committee members. In effect, those with a desire to look after their own interests in relation to DYO access were able to gain a seat on the CAC, and the body was viewed with some degree of suspicion by cavers from outside the Swansea valley. In 2005 I was invited to stand for election to the CAC and despite some concerns about committing to this (I was dad to a newborn) I was duly elected.

For some while I was a thorn in the side of other cavers then on the committee. There were differences of opinion on a number of issues and I did my best to represent what I thought were the views of the active caving community, particularly with regard to matters like the provision of fixed aids within DYO. A significant cave rescue in 2008 caused some waves; Elsie Little was dismissed as Wardens' Sec and I was asked to take on the role. With a brief interlude, I have held that position ever since.

Unfortunately matters became increasingly difficult. There were a number of breaches of the cave's conservation rules and despite our best efforts the showcave owner felt that the cavers on the panel were toothless in dealing with this. In addition, members of the committee were on the receiving end of abusive emails regarding conservation matters and in the end the showcave scrapped the CAC and reformed the body as the CAP. The essential difference is that while previously cavers were elected on to the committee by wardens, cavers on the CAP are appointed. In reality there is very little difference; the members come from the same small pool of those with an interest in the cave.

There is no great secrecy about who sits on the CAP. I am happy to be the public face of this to cavers, but it would be remiss of me to mention the other cavers involved without their permission - as mentioned above, panel members have in the past been on the receiving end of unwarranted and unacceptable abuse. The minutes of meetings are not published because matters are discussed that are potentially commercially sensitive, from the showcave's point-of-view, but if anyone wants information about issues pertaining to caving in DYO then please feel free to get in touch. There is no intention to be in any way secretive and indeed my view is that cavers should be more involved in the decision-making process; as mentioned above, there have been times in the past when the cavers on the CAC/CAP were seriously out-of-touch with the views of active cavers.

With regard to access to the cave; visiting clubs can request a trip and I will do my best to find a volunteer Warden to take them. BCA insurance is a prerequisite. Anyone who wants a Warden permit can apply for one but will need a recommendation from a Warden who has accompanied them into the cave. It's important that anyone leading trips into the cave understands the flood risks and the conservation issues, and the showcave want the reassurance that only responsible cavers have access to their property. Such applications are rarely refused: I can't remember anyone being declined, although two cavers have had permits withdrawn for serious breaches of the cave rules. Despite the complaints of some the system is not onerous; the showcave have every right to protect their business and their property and cavers should consider themselves extremely fortunate that caving access is as readily available as it is. In reality, the biggest restriction on access to DYO is the Welsh weather - between October and April you need a sustained dry spell for safe access to be possible and even in the summer months access is by no means guaranteed. If anyone wants more information, please get in touch.             

   
 

2xw

Active member
Given your commitment to non-secrecy, any chance of sharing who wrote this article, and what their purpose was in writing it?

All it seems to have done is to generate negative publicity for the showcave and cast the management group in somewhat of a bad (hypocritical) light.
 

Tony_B

Member
2xw said:
Given your commitment to non-secrecy, any chance of sharing who wrote this article, and what their purpose was in writing it?

All it seems to have done is to generate negative publicity for the showcave and cast the management group in somewhat of a bad (hypocritical) light.

I don't know who wrote it. Best ask Darkness Below, who credited it to an 'Administrator'. My understanding is that the information was provided by the showcave, but I reiterate that there is nothing new in any of it. Those of us who have been into the cave in the last two or three years have seen the metal grille and the explanatory notice. As far as I am aware none of the cavers on the CAP contributed; the one who was contacted made suggestions which were largely ignored.

The allegation of hypocrisy towards the DYO CAP can only be levelled by those not in possession of the full facts. I'm not going to fuel the flames any more but I say again that there are a unique set of circumstances around the dig at Nant y Gwared that do not apply to other projects in the DYO catchment and beyond.     
 

Tony_B

Member
NewStuff said:
So, it's a rumor that someone has restarted a dig. Has anyone bothered to actually go and check this? Is someone actually digging again, or is it still abandoned?

In the interests of honesty and full disclosure: at the meeting of the DYO CAP on 4th Nov this year it was suggested that the dig at Nant y Gwared had been surreptitiously restarted. There is - as far as I can tell - no direct, reliable evidence of this. However the Swansea valley is not a large area and people see things. Sometimes they put 2 and 2 together and make 5. Or even 6.

The cavers on the CAP who dig (most of us) made the point that if the dig had been restarted then it would be obvious. The NRW and BBNPA are very sensitive to this issue, as of course is the landowner who came close to prosecution, and my personal view is that I think it unlikely that anyone would chance their arm re-opening this project, given the history and the potential consequences.   
 

MarkS

Moderator
As an essentially impartial observer (I've visited DYO once and don't regularly cave in the region), there do seem to be two aspects that have been raised here but not responded to, answers to which would seem to go a long way to simplifying the issues.

PeteHall has repeatedly asked why the current un-gated second entrance (the resurgence) is not a problem insurance-wise, but why a second un-gated entrance would be. If the resurgence is a problem, it would seem alternative insurance is required now (which could then cover any other entrances), and if it is not a problem then presumably an additional entrance would also not be a problem insurance-wise.

alastairgott has also repeatedly asked why the gate that has been installed at the end of the showcave can't just be locked. Wardens with keys are required to access the show-cave as things stand, so carrying 1 extra key would not seem too much of a hassle, and would seem to pre-emptively solve the issue of any potential additional entrances.

I'm not suggesting an additional entrance would be a good thing. It just seems these are two straightforward questions, answers to which would enable the insurance problem (seemingly the focus of the darkness below article) to be separated from the more complex issues of the ins and outs of the merits of single or multiple entrances, or working out exactly whose digs have what permissions. :confused:
 

Rhys

Moderator
The resurgence entrance is not the same as an entrance elsewhere on the mountain. The resurgence lies within the showcave complex and is easily monitored by CCTV etc. Perhaps the insurers (if they even know about it) might consider it less of a risk.
 

Rhys

Moderator
The insurance "issue" is probably a red herring, in any case. If the showcave owners want to deny caver access, for whatever reason, they can and they will. It wouldn't be the first time.
 

Simon Beck

Member
Tony_B said:
Simon Beck said:
No permission required but all trips must be warden-led? Kind of a contradiction if you ask me. Non of my business to comment, I don't cave in that region, but sounds like a bloody monopoly to me.

Clearly you don't cave in this part of the world or you'd understand what this means. 'No permission required' means that you don't need to arrange trips in advance with the showcave (unlike some others). A Warden can arrange to take a party according to his/her and their availability and just turn up and wave their permit (or collect a key, if the showcave is closed.) Hope this clarifies the meaning.

Thanks for spelling it out to me, albeit there really wasn't any need. But like you say, as a northern caver the two pretty much mean the same thing
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top