dunc said:
Depends who you call a caver I guess!
I reckon I would call anyone who explores a cave a caver, wouldn't you?
Tony_B said:
It had been rendered unusable by an attempt to gain entry (unsuccessful) using force.
So if someone has attempted to gain entry to a cave I think it is reasonable to assume that they wished to do so in order to explore it, don't you?
Hence I think it is safe to say that the damage may well have been caused by someone wanting to go caving (i.e.cavers), regardless of their age or where they might live. Most likely people who are unaware of the correct procedure to follow to obtain access or who disagree with it, possibly because they regard it as elitist.
I do agree that it is surprising that this should happen at a cave where the access arrangements have been in place for a considerable time and appear to meet with the approval of the vast majority of cavers.
However, the bottom line is that as soon as you put a gate on any cave you run the risk of that gate being damaged or removed at some future date. Just ask John Parker how many times he had to replace the lock or the gate at Craig-ar-Ffynnon over the years!
It would be nice to think that these recent events in the Swansea Valley might encourage those who are in favour of restrictive access to caves in South Wales to re-examine their standpoint, certainly in an attempt to prevent something similar happening again.
Here is my solution:
Fit the same lock (openable with the same key) on ALL the gated caves in South Wales.
Make the key readily available to ALL cavers (not just those who choose to belong to clubs).